8 of Swords

Mar. 6th, 2017 09:41 am
tarot_scholar: An image of Norman Rockwell's interpretation of Rosie the Riveter (Rosie)
This is a card that has come up a lot for me in readings on unrelated subjects. Now, I'm fairly confident that I shuffled well enough to assure that the deck (Russian Tarot of St. Petersburg) was well and truly randomized between readings, so I want to take a moment to pay attention to this card and see if I'm missing anything.

The 8 of Swords typically features a captive figure (usually a woman) who is bound, blindfolded, and surrounded by swords, often some distance outside of a village, town, or other indication of civilization. Here is the Waite-Smith image that serves as the basis for many decks today:

In the Thoth deck, this card is titled "Interference"; in the OGD it was also known as "The Lord of Shortened Force." I think this is one of my favorite of Harris's cards; something about the colors and the background geometry and the placement of the swords all works together to invoke a sense of static-y disruption. For whatever reason, it's a card that I have no problem responding to an on instinctual level -- maybe even easier than I do with the Waite-Smith version.

One thing that comes up often with the 8 of Swords is that it represents a self-imposed bondage: one that is a result of overthinking, or in refusing to accept some obvious reality, rather than outside forces conspiring to keep you in your place.

In her companion book to the Russian Tarot of St. Petersburg, Giles highlights the differences in representations between the Russian Tarot and the Waite-Smith and other Waite-Smith inspired decks available at the time. Here, the captive figure's eyes are closed, instead of blindfolded, which highlights the self-imposed nature of the interference. Giles also points out the ambiguity of the floating sword: is it coming to cut through the binding ropes? will it simply settle into the ground with the other 7 swords? Is it, like the floating fourth cup in the 4 of Cups, potentially something unreal or imagined in nature? Overall, Giles concludes that the Russian Tarot's 8 of Swords is a little more hopeful than the Waite-Smith version.

My favorite name for this card is the OGD's "Lord of Shortened Force." I don't have ADHD myself, but I get that kind of vibe from the card: constant distractions, unable to focus, getting nothing done as a result. (Or having to do a lot of extra work just to tread water.) I admit to feeling like that a lot, recently. Seeing this in the outcome feels a lot more like "results unclear, try again later" than "no bueno." I'll have to lay out another reading later, when I'm less harried, and see if anything changes.
tarot_scholar: An image of Norman Rockwell's interpretation of Rosie the Riveter (Rosie)

I'm doing things a bit out of order, here. The truth is I need a bit more thinking on Days 6 and 7, so I'll come back to it in a moment. Day 8, on the other hand, is at least halfway easy!

For me (and honestly, I think if you polled people), the three scariest and most negative trumps are Death, the Devil, and The Tower. As is practically the in-joke right now, "DEATH ISN'T ALWAYS ACTUAL ACTUAL DEATH IT'S USUALLY CHANGE!!!" and so there's the positive spin. The Devil—The Devil is the card of Capricorn, which is all about hard work and creating structure and form. Even the artwork on the Thoth version of The Devil has an image of the anaphase portion of mitosis (a cell dividing in two to reproduce asexually) right in the foreground.

That leaves us The Tower.

But good spin can you possibly put on The Tower? It is the worst. It is losing your job, your spouse, and your parents in the same 24-hour stretch.

I guess, if one recovers from The Tower, you can say that it's given you a clean slate. A new start. That's the gist of what the Instagram posts for this one say. (A lot of other people also chose The Tower.) But if you never recover....?

I am dubious of this particular exercise, I suppose. "There is good and bad in everything!" smacks of the wrong kind of New Age frou-frou sweetness and light philosophy. Sometimes, things are terrible, and there's no two ways about it. Sometimes shit happesn to a person and there's no lesson to be learned, no "new path" to be taken. Sometimes it's just one more turd on a shit sundae, and to pretend otherwise is harmful.

tarot_scholar: An image of Norman Rockwell's interpretation of Rosie the Riveter (Rosie)
Days 3 and 4 of Shadow Work October make a nice pair, so I did them together

Brief comments on fear. )
tarot_scholar: An image of Norman Rockwell's interpretation of Rosie the Riveter (Rosie)
(or, is most often pulled to represent you?)

Most traditions assign Cancer (my Sun sign) to the Queen of Cups, and over time I've come to think of her as my significator:

Generally this is the card that feels the most "me" out of the courts. Aside from the Queen of Cups, I have a special place in my heart for the Queen of Swords: she is who I want to be:

However, it seems that the Page of Cups and the Page of Pentacles will pop once in a while to represent me.

tarot_scholar: An image of Norman Rockwell's interpretation of Rosie the Riveter (Rosie)
(Both in terms of artwork and divinatory meaning.)

I can't pick a favorite card universally. One artist will get one batch of cards completely right, another artist will get another, and a third, and so on, but I have yet to find a card that I feel is exceptionally well done across all the decks I use.

Artwork AND meaning:

I love the colors and the geometry of the Thoth's Star trump, so much so that I've designed a few pieces of jewelry around it. (A post for another day.)


(Josef Stalin as the Devil! Very appropriate.)

Bonus: favorite court cards

tarot_scholar: An image of Norman Rockwell's interpretation of Rosie the Riveter (Rosie)

After many years of admiring from a distance, I took the plunge and ordered a copy of the Victorian Romantic deck. I don't know how I first stumbled upon it—most likely during a Google image search for one particular card or another—but it was love at first sight.

I had gone through a phase where I bought nearly every Tarot deck I stumbled across, just because, and I've had a few cases of buyer's remorse. After that experience, I abstained for a while; I think the last Tarot deck I had purchased before the Victorian Romantic was my Russian Tarot of St. Petersburg, and that was in 2008. Six years without purchasing a single deck! You understand, then, the kind of impression the Victorian Romantic deck made on me.

There were a few different editions printed; the only one remaining in stock at Baba Studios is the 2012 special edition. The cards are large—taller and fatter than my St. Petersburg and my Thoth—and the images are sumptuous. It comes in a sturdy box of heavy cardboard with a hinged lid (rather than your usual flimsy paper box and a folded tab opening). Very protective, though the deck fits in so snugly that getting it in and out is tricky business and one should be careful.

This edition also has lovely gold trim on the sides, which I think is a wonderful touch. It catches the light as you shuffle  and makes everything feel all the more magical. The whole deck has an air of a bygone fantasy era and a general sense of luxury. That is one word that keeps jumping out at me with this deck: luxury. Every image is detailed and rich with color; every card seems to spring from a sense of dreamy nostalgia where everything is beautiful and nothing hurts. Some of the images in this edition are new and did not originally appear in the first one, though I'm not sure which particular cards were changed. It also comes with two copies of The Lovers: one called "Dante and Beatrice" and the other called "Swept off her feet." I opted to use the latter for readings and keep "Dante and Beatrice" aside.

What makes this deck particularly interesting is that, because it is collage work of Victorian Classicism engravings and illustrations, most of the cards lack the traditional symbolism of having six pentacles or three cups or so on. There is nary a sword to be found in the above 8 of Swords card, for example. Some of the images chosen are also, in my opinion, quite unconventional and surprising. Nonetheless, they all fit well with the meanings of the cards; if anything, their departure from Pamela Coleman Smith's images in the Waite-Smith deck (upon which this deck is based) does a lot to clarify some cards and shed some light on their meaning.

I also appreciate the Court cards in this deck. Court cards have traditionally been simple portraits of their subject. There is only so much you can glean from a person sitting alone, however; while I've had the elemental associations and meanings memorized for years now, I've never been able to really "get" most of the courts and have longed for a deck that showed them interacting with the world and other people. I think the best ones I've seen have been Lady Freida Harris's—while they are still single-subject portraits, her use of perspective and geometry and color, in addition to the slightly more esoteric animal symbolism, was absolutely first-rate. Her court images still manage to convey a lot of information and ~feeling~ right on the surface.

Likewise in Marchetti's Gilded Tarot, he tried to convey the nature of the Queens by their posture/gaze/relationship with a column.

And Pamela Coleman Smith left clues in the nature of the Knights' horses and how they were riding.

Which has been a technique other artists have followed:

Here, many of the Court cards are shown with people. It seems like such a minor detail but it can make all the difference (for me).

 In my binge-buying days, I liked to sometimes do an introductory reading to learn a little bit about my new deck. I did the same with this deck. I also looked into all of the rituals and readings people do with a new deck, but most of what I could find seemed to be variations on the theme of cleansing: sage smudging, crystals, spritzing with herbal infusions, and so on. Daily Tarot Girl (a Tarot blog I hadn't encountered until now) suggests something similar to what I would do: ask your deck questions about itself. She also gives some suggestions about questions you might want to ask.

I opted for a simple three-card layout, but obviously that's what worked for me. I like three-card layouts; I like 3. You might like 1, or 4, or 7, or 10, or or or or....

How would you describe yourself? 7 of Cups

What attitude do you like? Knight of Wands

What attitude do you dislike? Ace of Wands

The 7 of Cups is one of those unconventional cards I mentioned earlier. The traditional Waite-Smith imagery for this card is a figure, back turned, gazing upon a dream of seven chalices. This is the theme you see in most Waite-Smith clones. But in the Victorian Romantic, we have a goblin-looking creature fishing treasures out of the murky depths. Or is he using them as bait to lure in unwary travelers? In the depths is a more human-looking figure, gaze fixed on the gold at the end of the fisherman's line. It is a totally unconventional representation of the lure of the 7 of Cups, but it works.

As a representative card of this deck, and how it chose to describe itself, it works: after all, the language I was using to describe it earlier falls under the realm of the 7 of Cups: luxury, magic, nostalgia, fantasy. And the card's unconventional art speaks to the various unorthodox facets of this deck. That said, it also seems like a bit of a trickster card to pick: the 7 of Cups is not without delusion and deceit. As any Tarot reader will tell you, the cards are not without a sense of humor.

The Knight of Wands is standing with his horse and talking to a woman who seems totally and utterly cheesed with him, while he has the tiniest hints of a smirk on his face. It's like he's just made some groaner of a pun or cutting remark that his companion is just not having. Still, he's a charmer; if he weren't, he wouldn't be talking to anyone at all. Confidence, charm, and enthusiasm. The Knight of Wands doesn't take anything too seriously. This seems more and more like a deck full of levity and goodwill.

The Aces, usually considered positive cards, can also have their downsides. There is such a thing as "too much of a good thing," after all. Mahony and Ukolov give positive and negative meanings for each card in the LWB (I'm a big fan of privileging the small details of a deck's LWB over generic, pan-deck meanings when those pan-deck meanings don't necessarily play out), and for the Ace of Wands they mention "machismo and forcefulness." With the wands in particular there is also the risk of brash, selfish ego; the obsession with the sacred fire of one's self. That Knight is only charming because he knows when to lay off and is sensitive to other people.

An unconventional deck with a sense of humor who dislikes people who are too far up their own asses and who too convinced of their own greatness. Well! Nice to meet you, Victorian Romantic. I'm sure we'll get to know each other quite well.

tarot_scholar: An image of Norman Rockwell's interpretation of Rosie the Riveter (Rosie)

Happy Midsummer, one and all! I decided to mark the occasion with a reading on another writing project, GAL. Starting with only the scrap of a D&D character, I tried my hand at urban fantasy with GAL during 2013's National Novel-Writing Month (NaNoWriMo) and found myself stuck on plot. There are people in the world who win NaNoWriMo—that is to say, they write 50,000 words—by the seat of their pants, and I will never understand how they do it.

It's a character I like and it's a premise I think is interesting, so bring in the Tarot to help.

More about GAL. )

Many Tarot readers talk about the Tarot as simply reminding people of what they already know. Indeed, much of what showed up here I already knew and did little more than reinforce the story as it already is, using some of the same cards I would have chosen myself. I haven't walked away from this reading with anything really new and substantive, which is what I was looking for. This is why formulating a good question is so important for reading Tarot. And also having a good solid meal beforehand so you come at it with a clear head. ;) Even looking at this story months later I'm still blocked where I am, nor does this reflection point me in any particularly fruitful new directions. A follow-up is necessary but first I need to figure out what I need to know—my "known unknowns."
Page generated Sep. 20th, 2017 02:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios